SVA EV-1703 17-Inch LCD Flat Panel TV

Electronics : SVA EV-1703 17-Inch LCD Flat Panel TV

SVA EV-1703 17-Inch LCD Flat Panel TV

from: SVA



 : SVA EV-1703 17-Inch LCD Flat Panel TV
See Larger Image







Binding: Electronics
Brand: SVA
EAN: 0827656072119
Label: SVA
Manufacturer: SVA
Model: EV-1703
Publisher: SVA
Studio: SVA
Warranty: 3 years warranty



Editorial Review:






Features:
  • 17-inch flat-panel active-matrix TFT LCD TV/monitor
  • 1,280 x 1,024 native pixel resolution
  • Composite- and S-video inputs; offers RGB analog computer input for dual-purpose PC/TV use
  • High 400:1 contrast ratio, 250 cd/m2 brightness, fast 20 ms typical response time
  • Measures 17.7 x 17.1 x 7.1 inches (W x H x D), with stand





Accessories:
     see more

Accessories:











banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
  banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

Code:  security image
Please enter the Code: 



Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Nice TV. Adjustment Needed.
Hi. Works fine but picture could be sharper. Can someone who has done the picture adjustments post how to finetune it for a better picture quality? thanks.



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Good nang for the dollar
Bought it since my daughter needed to set a tv in a rather crowded, space-constrained table. This was ideal since the price was right. Have had it for 2 weeks, works great. However, the picture tends to be on the dark side (btw, i know to make all the adjustments needed etc). Also, 3-4 cable channels had to be manually "fine" tuned for better picture. A truly good buy for the $. Let us hope this thing lasts for a while.



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Mounting this Puppy
Price is why anyone will buy this as a TV - some people here have said to spend the extra 50-75 and get a better brand name - I did not see a flat screen 17" LCD anywhere near the $350 range. Besides this one of course.

I wanted to pass along info for those who would like to install this TV on a swivel mount - I purchased a Sanus swivel arm mount because the Sanus Customer Service told me that this model of TV is compatible. It is not. You need to purchase something called an interface bracket for any VESA mount to work. The manufacturer of this compatibility bracket is Chief Manufacturing, model number is FSB-4221 (black or silver) -- it was not cheap. All - in I spent $140 mounting this TV to the wall - $60 for the Sanus swivel arm and $80 for this FSB compatibility bracket, which is essentially a metal plate with some screwholes in it.

So -- if you do want to mount this TV to the wall on a swivel or tilt arm, buy a TV from a brand name company for $360 or less and you will be ahead of the game. Make sure the brand name TV is VESA compatible - buy it instead of this one and you'll be happy you did. All in all, I'm still happy with this purchase but after paying so much for mounting, its not as much of a great deal!



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Not bad for the price--nice picture.
I needed a TV for use in my den where I do some work and where I have a treadmill for working out. My problem is that I did not have the space for any other furniture on which to put a regular CRT TV, nor did I want to get one of those wall mounting "arms" which would stick out a few feet. Those arms also run upwards of $100 for a 20" TV, so a decent 20" plus the arm would cost $250 to $300.
Then I saw this LCD TV on Amazon, which was in the price range I was willing to pay for a CRT plus arm. The 17" size would be close enough to the viewing area of a 20" CRT, so I thought this would be a good compromise--no furniture needed, no big ugly arm, etc. The idea was to hang it on the wall.
In opening the box, you notice that it is obviously not a top of the line product, but it does work as advertised. The picture needs a bit of tweaking from the factory settings, and the result is quite acceptable. I was afraid the 250 nits brightness would be a problem, but it really is bright enough. Also, I think the viewing angle is actually wider than the specs. The fact that it doubles as a computer monitor is also a plus. For the $299 and free shipping and no tax, I cannot complain at all. Similar 17" LCD TV's can easily cost hundreds more.
The remote is a bit small, but usable (it takes 2 AAA batteries which are not included), and the on screen display for changing brightness, contrast, etc. is helpful. The sound is pretty good, but is not very "full" or "deep". It's fine for me, however.
There is one thing that is not mentioned in the specs that may be a plus to some, a minus to others. If you want to wall mount the TV, it does not have the VESA compliant mount couplings on the back. So if you want to put it on an articulating arm or some sort of swivel arm that needs a VESA mount, you may have a problem. If, however, you just want to hang it flush on the wall (as I did), you will be pleasantly surprised (as I was) that you do not have to invest another $30 for a flush VESA wall mount. It has two "key" holes in the back, so just measure between them (about 9"), find two screws with heads big enough to get locked in the "keys", and you are in business. It took me about 10 minutes, 2 screws and 2 drywall anchors, and it hangs perfectly flush on the wall. The hardware probably cost me 30 cents, not 30 dollars as I was going to spend. A nice plus for me.
Another note for wall mounting. The instruction booklet has no information on how to remove the monitor stand, but it was really easy to do. On the back of the stand are two small plastic covers that easily pry off, revealing two screws that connect the stand to the monitor. Remove those screws and the stand just comes off. Just save the stand and the screws for future use.
All in all, if space is an issue, and you are looking for a decent TV picture (but not top of the line by any stretch) for a good price, look no further. Also, if you need an LCD monitor, it does a good job for that, and you get a TV as a bonus. Not a bad deal at all.



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Not too bad. . .
The set has limitations. No PIP. Bad speaker sound. Not easy to switch between inputs without remote. No component video or DVI. Not a super bright picture with high contrast. The biggest setback for me is that there are some artifacts and bluring with fast video when sitting close to the screen (< 3 feet) but the video is fine when sitting 5 feet back. This is from a person who considers his eyes sensitive to imaging; I choose LCD over DLP projection because I can see the rainbow effect etc.. While on this subject, this LCD is very easy on the eye. I recommend LCDs in general; my experience is that they are much easier on the eyes. Another positive is that I've done some flight simulator stuff on this and it looks great. For the money, this is a great buy. If money were not an option, I would consider this 3.5 on a 5 point scale. If you pay 2-3 times as much money, you will probably get a slightly better image on a smaller screen.
My two cents. Sincerely.



read more customer reviews on SVA EV-1703 17-Inch LCD Flat Panel TV


 


bla
- wodescreen tv
Pop Music - Shopreview




Dan Kaminsky, the security researcher who discovered a major flaw in the DNS protocol last year, said this week that broad adoption of DNS Security Extensions technology may be needed to protect systems, despite its complexity.

Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Twitter Add to Slashdot

Remember when those two satellites collided the other day? Seems that they'll be the space junk gift that keeps on giving, as their 800-km debris orbiting field could hamper all future space launches.

"Future launches will have to be adjusted with regard to the fact that the debris [from the collision] has spread over an 800-km area and will gather at a common orbit in 5-6 years," said Alexander Stepanov, director of the Pulkovo Observatory in St. Petersburg.

According to NASA this massive cloud of human failure joins the 19,000 other objects that currently pollute the low and high orbit space around the planet. As we reported last week, the Hubble Space Telescope is already in danger.

On a related note, anyone who criticized the Pixar movie Wall-E for "liberal bias" or for "unfairly" depicting future humans as slovenly creatures that polluted Earth and space to the point where it was uninhabitable is a dufus. And so ends my personal rant for the day. [Space Fellowship]



via Gizmodo

The W3C Multimodal Interaction working group has posted the finished recommendation of EMMA: Extensible MultiModal Annotation markup language. According to the abstract, this spec "provides details of an XML markup language for containing and annotating the interpretation of user input. Examples of interpretation of user input are a transcription into words of a raw signal, for instance derived from speech, pen or keystroke input, a set of attribute/value pairs describing their meaning, or a set of attribute/value pairs describing a gesture. The interpretation of the user's input is expected to be generated by signal interpretation processes, such as speech and ink recognition, semantic interpreters, and other types of processors for use by components that act on the user's inputs such as interaction managers."

Mckinsey licks finger, asks audience where to stick....

MWC Day four of Mobile World Congress saw an assembly of the mobile money working group. Flush with $12.5m from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, it’s working towards the GSMA's target of getting 20m of the 1bn people who have a mobile phone but do not have a bank account onto the first rung of the financial ladder.…

Free whitepaper - Integrating information across the enterprise






SVA EV-1703 17-Inch LCD Flat Panel TV

Shopping